The Bombay High Court has raised serious concerns regarding the encounter of Akshay Shinde, the accused in the Badlapur sexual assault case. The court observed that Shinde’s death could have been avoided and has asked the police several critical questions.
Why Was the Accused Shot in the Head?
The High Court questioned why the police found it necessary to shoot the accused directly in the head when he could have been neutralized by shooting him in the arms or legs. The court further stated that the police could have potentially avoided the use of lethal force. Additionally, the court asked why the police did not attempt to subdue the accused before resorting to gunfire.
Need for an Impartial Investigation
During the hearing of the case, the High Court emphasized the need for a fair and impartial investigation into the death of the accused. The case came to light when Akshay Shinde’s father filed a petition in court, seeking justice for his son’s death.
Police’s Account of the Incident
Following the encounter, the police stated that Shinde had snatched a pistol from two officers and opened fire, seriously injuring one of them. According to the police, it was in this retaliatory firing that Shinde was killed.
The court’s decision to closely examine this case highlights its commitment to ensuring that the law is followed correctly and that all actions taken by law enforcement are just and necessary.