Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has voiced support for a proposed halt to attacks on energy infrastructure announced by US President Donald Trump, while stressing that Moscow must also commit to the initiative for it to produce meaningful results.

In a statement shared on social media on October , Zelenskyy said he had discussed the proposal with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The conversations focused on the proposed energy ceasefire and the steps needed to reduce tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

Zelenskyy said Ukraine was prepared to support the initiative but was waiting for further information from the American side. His remarks indicate that, although Kyiv has expressed its backing, important details about the proposed arrangement still need clarification.

Ukraine Calls for Reciprocal Commitment

The Ukrainian president emphasised that Russia’s participation would be essential to the proposal’s success. A pause in attacks cannot provide lasting protection to energy facilities if only one side observes the arrangement.

The issue is particularly significant because energy infrastructure plays a central role in maintaining electricity supplies, heating, industrial activity and essential public services. Damage to power stations, fuel facilities and electricity networks can affect civilians well beyond the immediate area of an attack.

A mutually observed halt could reduce the immediate threat to these installations and create additional space for diplomatic engagement. However, its effectiveness would depend on the conditions agreed by both countries and the ability to verify compliance.

Diplomatic Consultations Gain Importance

Zelenskyy’s discussions with Carney, Stubb and Rutte brought several international partners into conversations about the proposed initiative. Their involvement reflects the broader diplomatic interest in preventing further escalation and exploring measures that could limit the consequences of the conflict.

The announcement also places responsibility on Washington to communicate the proposal’s precise terms. Questions concerning which facilities would be covered, when the arrangement would begin, how long it would remain in effect and what would happen following an alleged violation are important to its practical implementation.

Until these issues are clarified and both sides confirm their participation, the proposal should not be confused with a fully operational ceasefire.

Protecting Civilians and Critical Infrastructure

Energy systems have become an important concern in the wider conflict because disruptions can affect households, hospitals, businesses and other essential services. Protecting such infrastructure could help reduce civilian hardship, although it would not by itself resolve the political and territorial disputes underlying the war.

Zelenskyy reiterated Ukraine’s support for steps intended to reduce hostilities, protect human lives and establish conditions for a durable peace.

The immediate question is whether Russia will endorse the proposed arrangement and whether both governments can translate their stated positions into clear, verifiable commitments. Until that happens, the initiative remains a potential avenue for de-escalation rather than proof that attacks have stopped.