New York: Diplomatic efforts to end the prolonged conflict between the United States and Iran have entered another phase, with officials from both countries engaging separately with mediators as international pressure grows for a negotiated solution.

The latest contacts took place as mediators attempted to bridge significant differences between Washington and Tehran. Discussions are reportedly focused on a revised version of a seven-day proposal put forward by Iran during the United Nations General Assembly.

Mediators Try to Bridge the Gap

The negotiations are being conducted indirectly, with mediators communicating between the two sides rather than relying on direct US-Iran talks.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has remained involved in discussions in New York, while regional mediators have been working to convey proposals between the parties.

The immediate objective is to establish conditions that could stop the fighting and create a framework for further negotiations.

Strait of Hormuz Remains a Major Issue

A central element of the diplomatic discussions is the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy-shipping routes.

Iran has linked the reopening of the waterway to conditions involving the conflict, sanctions and other measures. Any disruption of traffic through the strait has significant implications for international energy markets because large volumes of oil normally pass through the region.

The continued uncertainty surrounding the waterway has already contributed to volatility in global oil prices.

Iran’s Proposed Framework

Iran’s latest proposal includes several conditions aimed at stopping hostilities and restoring economic and maritime activity.

Among the issues discussed are sanctions affecting Iranian oil exports, frozen Iranian assets, the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

In exchange, Tehran has indicated a willingness to resume negotiations concerning its nuclear programme.

The proposal remains subject to negotiations, and there is no confirmed comprehensive agreement between the two governments.

Washington Remains Cautious

The United States has expressed skepticism about some aspects of Iran’s proposals while keeping diplomatic channels open through mediators.

US officials have emphasized the need for firm commitments concerning Iran’s nuclear activities and the security of commercial shipping.

President Donald Trump has publicly made clear that Washington has not accepted Iran’s earlier proposal, while also indicating that further discussions could take place.

Global Economic Consequences

The diplomatic developments are being closely monitored beyond Washington and Tehran.

The conflict has disrupted energy markets and created uncertainty around international shipping. Higher oil prices can increase transportation and production costs and add to inflationary pressures in countries that depend heavily on imported energy.

A successful diplomatic arrangement that restores normal shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could therefore have consequences for global commodity markets.

No Final Agreement Yet

Despite renewed mediation, major disagreements remain between the United States and Iran.

The sequence of possible measures—such as ending military operations, changing sanctions, reopening the waterway and restarting nuclear negotiations—remains an important part of the discussions.

For now, the latest contacts represent another diplomatic effort rather than a concluded peace agreement. Further negotiations will determine whether the two sides can narrow their differences and establish a sustainable ceasefire framework.