U.S. President Donald J. Trump has sharply criticized an upcoming book by journalist Margaret (Margot) Hagerman, calling it “largely fiction” and accusing the author of publishing misleading claims to attract public attention. In a strongly worded statement, Trump rejected the book’s reported assertions and described it as another example of what he considers politically motivated reporting.

According to the President, a brief summary of the book was enough for him to conclude that much of its content was inaccurate. He argued that the publication relies on fabricated stories and disputed the suggestion that it contains confidential recordings or evidence supporting its claims. Trump insisted that the alleged audio material referenced in reports does not exist.

The President also renewed his long-standing criticism of sections of the American media, accusing some journalists and authors of repeatedly publishing stories that he believes are designed to damage his reputation. He claimed that despite what he described as a record of incorrect reporting over the years, books and reports targeting him continue to receive significant public attention.

Trump used the opportunity to highlight his election victory, pointing to his performance across key battleground states, the national popular vote, and widespread county-level support. He argued that the election results reflected a decisive mandate from American voters and said critics continue to underestimate the scale of his political support.

The statement also revisited previous controversies that have shaped American politics over the past several years. Trump again rejected allegations connected to past investigations into Russian election interference, maintaining that earlier claims against him had been disproven and describing those investigations as politically driven.

Beyond domestic politics, the President concluded his remarks by reaffirming his administration’s position on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. He declared that preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon remains a central national security objective and reiterated that the United States would continue pursuing policies aimed at ensuring that outcome.

The latest comments add to the continuing public dispute between Trump and members of the American media, a relationship that has been marked by frequent criticism, legal challenges, and competing narratives over political events. Books examining Trump’s presidency have regularly generated intense public debate, with supporters often dismissing them as biased while critics argue they provide important insight into his leadership and decision-making.

As anticipation surrounding the publication grows, political observers expect the disagreement to fuel further discussion about media credibility, political accountability, and the role of investigative journalism in shaping public opinion. Whether the book influences the broader political conversation will likely depend on the evidence it presents and how readers evaluate the competing claims made by its author and the President.