German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called on all parties involved in the Iran conflict to pursue a diplomatic solution, warning that continued military operations cannot provide a lasting resolution to the crisis.

Speaking in Seoul, South Korea, on October 30, Merz stressed that negotiations and coordinated international diplomatic efforts were necessary to bring the confrontation to an end.

His remarks came amid growing reports that the United States and Israel could consider renewed military operations against Iran following the November 3 US midterm elections.

The German chancellor’s intervention reflects increasing European concerns about the possibility of a prolonged conflict and its consequences for international security, energy supplies and the global economy.

Merz Says Military Action Cannot Resolve the Conflict

During his statement, Merz appealed directly to all countries involved in the confrontation to avoid relying exclusively on military measures.

He emphasised that the conflict could not be resolved through military means and called for stronger diplomatic coordination.

According to the German chancellor, Berlin is working through several international channels to strengthen diplomatic initiatives and encourage discussions capable of bringing the hostilities to an end.

Germany wants the conflict to conclude as quickly as possible, particularly because its economic consequences are already creating serious concerns across Europe.

Merz also indicated that his government has a strong economic interest in preventing further escalation.

Reports of Possible New US Military Operations

The German statement followed reports suggesting that Washington had communicated with several Gulf Arab governments about preparations for a possible new military campaign against Iran.

According to a Wall Street Journal report cited by Anadolu Agency, the proposed operation could be short but intense and might take place after the November 3 American midterm elections.

The reported preparations have increased diplomatic uncertainty across the Middle East.

However, the possibility of renewed military operations remains dependent on political and military decisions, and the reported plans should not be treated as confirmation that another campaign will begin.

European governments are particularly concerned that another escalation could make diplomatic negotiations more difficult.

Rising Energy Costs Increase Europe’s Concerns

One of the major concerns raised by Merz is the economic impact of the conflict.

European countries have faced significant pressure from changing energy prices and uncertainty surrounding international oil and gas supplies.

The Strait of Hormuz is especially important because a substantial proportion of the world’s internationally traded petroleum passes through this narrow waterway.

Any prolonged disruption could affect crude oil transportation, shipping costs and fuel prices across international markets.

Germany, as one of Europe’s largest industrial economies, is particularly sensitive to fluctuations in energy costs.

Higher energy expenses can increase production costs for manufacturing companies, affect transportation businesses and place additional pressure on household budgets.

Merz has therefore emphasised that ending the confrontation is not only a diplomatic priority but also an important economic objective for Germany.

Germany Supports International Diplomatic Coordination

Berlin has indicated that it is prepared to work with international partners to encourage a negotiated outcome.

Germany’s diplomatic approach focuses on reducing hostilities, maintaining regional stability and preventing the conflict from spreading further.

Merz’s remarks also reflect broader European concerns about the consequences of prolonged instability in the Middle East.

European governments have been attempting to balance their security relationships with the United States and Israel against the economic and humanitarian risks associated with continued military confrontation.

A negotiated arrangement could provide an opportunity to address security concerns while reducing the possibility of further regional escalation.

Washington Faces Growing International Pressure

The German position highlights the differences that can emerge between Washington and its European partners over the handling of international conflicts.

While the United States has maintained its security objectives regarding Iran, European leaders have increasingly emphasised the need for a clear diplomatic pathway.

Germany’s call for negotiations adds to international pressure for renewed diplomatic engagement.

The situation also presents challenges for Gulf countries, which have an interest in regional security, uninterrupted energy exports and the protection of critical infrastructure.

What Happens Next?

The coming days could prove important for diplomatic efforts surrounding the Iran conflict, particularly as the United States approaches its November midterm elections.

Governments across Europe and the Middle East will be watching for signals from Washington and Tehran regarding the possibility of renewed negotiations.

Merz’s statement makes Germany’s position clear: military operations alone cannot provide a sustainable political settlement.

Whether diplomatic initiatives can prevent another escalation will depend on the willingness of the countries involved to engage in meaningful negotiations.

For Germany, the priority remains ending the confrontation, protecting economic stability and avoiding a wider crisis that could affect international energy supplies and regional security.