Uganda Declares Bundibugyo Ebola Outbreak Over After 42 Days Without New Cases
Kampala, August 29, 2026: Uganda has officially ended its 2026 outbreak of Ebola disease caused by the Bundibugyo virus after completing a 42-day period without detecting a new confirmed case, marking a significant success for the country’s public-health response.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention welcomed the development, saying Uganda’s response helped prevent the outbreak from developing into a larger national health emergency.
Monitoring Period Completed
Uganda’s health authorities began the final countdown after the last confirmed Ebola patient was discharged from treatment on July 16.
The 42-day monitoring period is based on two maximum incubation periods for Bundibugyo virus disease. No new confirmed infection was identified during that period, allowing authorities to formally end the outbreak.
WHO subsequently confirmed that the enhanced monitoring period had been completed without evidence of continued transmission.
Twenty Confirmed Cases Recorded
Uganda recorded 20 confirmed Ebola cases during the outbreak, including two deaths.
The majority of infections were linked to imported cases originating from the neighbouring Democratic Republic of the Congo. According to WHO, 15 confirmed cases were imported, while five additional cases occurred among contacts and healthcare workers associated with those infections.
The outbreak was initially declared in Uganda in May after authorities identified infections connected to the continuing Ebola outbreak in the DRC.
Rapid Response Helped Contain Transmission
Uganda’s health system moved quickly to identify suspected infections, isolate patients, trace contacts and monitor people who may have been exposed.
Healthcare facilities and public-health teams also strengthened infection-prevention procedures to reduce the possibility of transmission inside hospitals and communities.
The successful completion of the monitoring period suggests that those measures helped interrupt transmission before the outbreak could expand substantially.
Cross-Border Movement Remains a Concern
Although Uganda is now officially free of the outbreak, health authorities are not treating the development as a reason to abandon surveillance.
The DRC continues to experience active transmission of Bundibugyo virus, creating a continuing possibility of imported infections into neighbouring countries. WHO has therefore emphasized the importance of maintaining surveillance and preparedness along border areas.
Population movement between Uganda and the DRC, including travel connected with trade and other activities, means that health officials must remain prepared to identify and isolate any future imported infection rapidly.
Congo Faces a Much Larger Crisis
Uganda’s success contrasts sharply with the situation across the border in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
WHO reported that, as of August 26, the DRC had recorded 5,794 confirmed cases and 2,786 deaths. The outbreak had expanded to 60 health zones across six provinces.
The figures make the DRC outbreak substantially larger than Uganda’s episode and demonstrate why neighbouring countries continue to maintain heightened preparedness.
International Partners Praise Uganda
WHO and Africa CDC have praised Uganda’s government, healthcare workers and response partners for their efforts to contain the disease.
The organizations highlighted surveillance, rapid detection, contact monitoring, infection prevention and community-level response as important components of the containment effort.
The experience also provides valuable lessons for other countries located near active Ebola transmission zones.
What the End of the Outbreak Means
The official declaration does not mean Uganda can completely stop Ebola preparedness.
Health authorities are expected to continue surveillance because the virus remains active in the wider region. Early detection will be particularly important if another imported infection occurs.
For ordinary residents, the declaration represents a major improvement in the national health situation. Hospitals and public-health authorities can shift from emergency outbreak operations toward continued monitoring and routine preparedness.
A Regional Reminder
Uganda’s experience demonstrates both the danger of cross-border infectious diseases and the importance of rapid public-health action.
The country faced an outbreak that was closely connected to transmission in the DRC, yet authorities were able to prevent sustained nationwide spread. The successful 42-day monitoring period provides evidence that early detection, isolation, contact tracing and coordinated healthcare responses can make a substantial difference.
However, with Ebola still spreading in neighbouring DRC, Uganda and other countries in the region will need to remain vigilant.
For now, the end of Uganda’s outbreak represents an important public-health milestone—but regional preparedness remains essential while transmission continues elsewhere.