The investigation into the high-profile POCSO case involving Tamil Nadu businessman R Veeramani has entered a wider phase, with authorities examining allegations involving multiple survivors and strengthening efforts to establish the full scope of the case.

The latest development came after Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay directed Chennai Police to intensify the investigation and ensure protection for survivors. According to the latest reports, eight survivors have so far recorded their statements as investigators continue examining evidence linked to the case.

Investigation Expands Beyond Original Complaint

The case originally came to police attention after a pen drive containing video evidence was submitted to authorities in 2025. The footage reportedly showed a minor girl being sexually abused.

The investigation initially faced difficulties because authorities said they were unable to identify or locate the girl shown in the footage. Police subsequently sought to close the case, but a Special POCSO Court did not accept the closure report and directed investigators to continue examining the matter.

The decision to continue the investigation became an important turning point. Further inquiries eventually led investigators to identify the survivor connected with the original video, while additional women and girls also came forward with allegations.

Eight Survivors Record Statements

Investigators have now recorded statements from eight survivors, according to the latest update.

The statements are being examined alongside digital evidence and other material collected during the investigation. Authorities are also attempting to establish the identities and circumstances of other people who may have information relevant to the case.

Reports have indicated that some of the alleged survivors were minors when the alleged offences took place. Their identities have not been disclosed, in keeping with legal protections for victims of sexual offences.

Police Examine Digital Evidence

Digital evidence has become a major component of the investigation.

Police have examined material recovered during searches and are investigating whether evidence connected to the alleged offences was tampered with or destroyed. Electronic devices and other material have reportedly been sent for forensic examination.

Investigators are also looking beyond the location connected to the original video to determine whether other properties or locations could be relevant to the allegations.

Court Intervention Played Key Role

The case has drawn attention to the role of judicial oversight after the Special POCSO Court rejected an earlier attempt to close the investigation.

The court’s decision kept the case open for further investigation, allowing police to pursue new leads and examine additional evidence. Subsequent investigative work led to the identification of the survivor in the original video and the emergence of allegations involving other survivors.

Accused Questioned in Custody

Veeramani and two associates were arrested in August in connection with the case. Police have also been examining the alleged role of the two associates as part of the wider investigation.

Because of Veeramani’s age and health condition, the court directed that questioning be conducted within the Puzhal Central Prison complex. The interrogation was also subject to judicially directed safeguards, including recording of the process and the presence of legal counsel.

The allegations against the accused remain subject to investigation and judicial proceedings.

Survivor Protection Becomes a Priority

With the number of people providing statements increasing, authorities have been directed to ensure that survivors receive appropriate protection during the investigation.

The latest instructions from the Tamil Nadu government emphasize a thorough investigation while safeguarding those who have come forward. Police are continuing to examine whether additional survivors or evidence could emerge as the investigation progresses.

The case remains under investigation, and the final findings will depend on the evidence collected, forensic analysis, survivor statements and subsequent court proceedings.